Page 98 — Here is an example of a Joint Resolution of Disapproval under the Congressional Review Act as introduced in the House of Representatives. (This resolution did not pass, though the regulation to which it was addressed—the Clean Power Plan—was struck down by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA (2022)).

Page 101 — Here is the FY 2024 Appropriations Act. If you want to find examples of appropriations riders, search for the phrase "None of the funds." It appears 221 times; each one of those is an example of Congress preventing an agency from doing something it would otherwise have the statutory authority to do.

Page 132 — The 1933 correspondence between FDR and William Humphrey, concluding with the former’s terse notice of termination, as reported by the Associated Press and printed in the New York Times on October 8, 1933.

Pages 175, 185-92 — Here is an example of a Regulatory Impact Analysis. The RIA, prepared by an outside contractor, quantifies the costs and benefits for an EPA proposal to lower the "maximum contaminant level" for arsenic in drinking water. It is dense and long, but you can get a sense of the document just from the Executive Summary (pages 1-1 to 1-8). Note that the RIA calculates costs and benefits for four different possible standards (3, 5, 10, and 20 parts per billion). EPA ultimately opted for the 10ppb option. The regulation is discussed in notes 4 and 5 at pages 188-89 of the casebook.